|
ABSTRACT |
|
The Binangonan Formation has been
previously dated as Upper Oligocene
(Smith, 1906;
Yabe & Hanzawa, 1929). Foronda (1987)
reported that the unit may extend to
Early Miocene on the basis of a larger
foraminiferal assemblage. He further
interpreted the Teresa Tuffaceous
Siltstone member (lower member) as
shallow water turbidite and the upper
limestone member as constituting a
typical reef complex. He concluded that
the shallow water turbidites served as a
carbonate platform upon which carbonate
deposition associated with reef building
initiated. However, no detailed
biostratigraphic work has been done in
estahl ishing the temporal relationship
between the members and the different
facies of the Binangonan Formation.
A series of samples taken from portions
of the Teresa Tutlaceous Siltstone and
the upper limestone member reveal a
strong variation in foraminiferal
assemblage indicating changing
environmental conditions at the time the
sequence was deposited. Samples taken
from the limestone interbeds have a
faunule exclusively of larger
foraminifera belonging to the genera
Lepidocyclina (Eulepidina,
Nephrolepidina), Spirocyclypeus, and
Miogypsina (Miogypsina),
with several genera of smaller benthonic
foraminifera such as Amphistegina. On
the other hand, the tuffaceous silstones
have a faunule of planktonic
foraminifera belonging to the genera
Globigerina, Globigerinoides
Globoquadrina, Globorotalia,
Globoratoloides, and Catapsydrax with
several genera of smaller benthonic
foraminifera which include Melonis,
Karreriella, Pleurostomella, Lenticulina,
and Nodosaria. These faunules are of
great interest as they all contain in
varying generic combination the same
genera and species of larger benthonic
and planktonic foraminifera. This
suggests a considerable mixing of fauna
by contemporaneous transfer of larger
foraminifera from shallow to deeper
waters probably as a result of turbidity
currents. In addition, the occurrence of
both benthonic and planktonic
foraminifera in the same sample within
the same formation may be significant as
these associations may provide the link
between these two groups in establishing
the age of Tertiary marine elements
whose age determination differ based on
one group in the absence of the other.
As far as the authors are aware, this is
the first time that planktonic
foraminifera have been found and studied
in the Binangonan formation. Previous
datings were based mainly on larger
foraminifera. However, dating using
planktonics show equivalence with larger
foraminiferal age assignments.
|
| |